HW Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

HW - Essay Example 332). SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley Act) demands the recording of the system used by management in an effort to evaluate its efficiency and announce any errors or weaknesses. This documentation is always subject to auditing requirements that may require constant revision (Natan, p. 333). Lastly, the 1386 regulation California Senate Bill mandates the proper requirements and abilities to be aware of any access to private California resident data by unauthorized parties. Identifying any such breaches requires the business to base its auditing requirements on effective privacy measures (Natan, p. 335). Auditing should include schema, stored procedures or activators, user freedoms, and other DDL changes. From protection, compliance, structure management, and procedural perspectives, these factors are vital collectively (Natan, p. 357). DDL instructions are most likely the most destructive instructions today and allow intruders to compromise any network with absolution from a security point of view. Numerous regulations made organizations and individual data users audit all changes to data configurations from a compliance point of view. Compliance requisites for schema modifications during auditing are frequently the same as the requisites characterized as under structural management and IP administration initiatives. As a result, an external party will be able to maliciously alter, utilize, and roll back schema to its original form. These functions can occur without the authorized user noticing, particularly when the entire process occurred within less than 24 hours (Natan, p. 358) . The DML audit trails discussed in Section 12.9 reveal how one can selectively determine the items and instructions that need auditing. This determination comes about through unsophisticated and rough calculations. More specifically, Ben Natan anticipates DML audit

Introduction to Business Law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Introduction to Business Law - Case Study Example The other party (Nuriya) cannot perform work that is significantly different than what is expected. Concerning the Act mentioned above, but in section 17 of Part II, applies to this situation and will be specially applied to this case as well. Throughout most of this remaining piece the Unfair Contract Terms will be abbreviated as â€Å"UCT† for convenience. It may appear that Nuriya did not conduct work that was unexpected of Flavio and Marco because they read the contract and made a payment that all agreed upon at that time was pertaining to the contract mentioned. Both Flavio and Marco did in fact â€Å"insist† on differences before agreement of the contract was made and those two made it clear that Nuriya should make these changes, the reasonable individual(s) would have known that Nuriya did not want to make such changes. The reason this is so is because Nuriya had added the clause â€Å"The agreement will be carried out under the conditions set up on Nuriyas previous communication.† The addition of this clause undoubtedly changes the conditions of the contract and if the other parties knowingly reads and made payment to this particular change then any payments to Nuriya would likely imply an understanding of the contract by Flavio and Marco. The other party (Nuriya) has not performed differently than what is expected. As per Schedule Two of the UCT Act (1977) â€Å"whether the customer knew or ought reasonably to have known of the existence and the extent of the term (having regard, among other things, to any custom of the trade and any previous course of dealing between the parties) is relevant here. More plainly, the contract possessed new language, and quite arguably Flavio and Marco should have known the new conditions written, and that signing the contract and additionally making a first payment to Nuriya after signing the contract would